ARCOM

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...

Fahmy, A, Hassan, T, Bassioni, H and McCaffer, R (2019) Dynamic scheduling model for the construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 313–30.

Geekiyanage, D and Ramachandra, T (2020) Nexus between running costs and building characteristics of commercial buildings: hedonic regression modelling. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 389–406.

Ling, F Y, Zhang, Z and Wong, W T (2020) How personality traits influence management styles of construction project managers. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 453–68.

• Type: Journal Article
• Keywords: Management style; Personality traits; Construction projects; Project managers;
• ISBN/ISSN: 2044-124X
• URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-09-2019-0086
• Abstract:
  This research investigates the dominant personality traits of construction project managers (PMs) and how their personality influences their management styles. An industry-wide survey with 70 PMs was conducted in Singapore. The survey data were subjected to inferential statistical tests. In-depth interviews were conducted with four subject matter experts. Majority of the sample PMs are male with age, education level and experience well spread. The dominant personality traits of PMs are found to be: high in Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Openness and low in Neuroticism. PMs adopt “team leadership” style in which they place high emphasis on both the work that they need to complete and the people they lead. Their Agreeableness and Conscientiousness may improve over time. The correlations and regressions cannot prove causality. It is discovered that PMs who have high conscientiousness and high openness personalities are more likely to be leaders who are concerned for both the people that they lead and production outcomes. The implication is that employers may wish to conduct personality tests at the time of hiring to ensure good job match. This study is novel because it integrated two areas of knowledge – personality traits and management style. The regression analysis discovered that Openness and Conscientiousness traits may be used to predict PMs' management styles. This suggests that if personality tests are administered at hiring stage, the outcomes may be used to match potential hires to the jobs that they are being considered for.

Mathar, H, Assaf, S, Hassanain, M A, Abdallah, A and Sayed, A M (2020) Critical success factors for large building construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 349–67.

Mwesigwa, R, Nabwami, R, Mayengo, J and Basulira, G (2020) Contractual completeness as a cornerstone to stakeholder management in public private partnership projects in Uganda. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 469–84.

Shojaei, P and bolvardizadeh, A (2020) Rough MCDM model for green supplier selection in Iran: a case of university construction project. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 437–52.

Shooshtarian, S, Lingard, H and Wong, P S (2020) Using the cost of construction work to trigger legislative duties for WHS: the Australian experience. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 369–87.

Vilventhan, A and Rajadurai, R (2019) 4D Bridge Information Modelling for management of bridge projects: a case study from India. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 423–35.

Wuni, I Y and Shen, G Q (2020) Stakeholder management in prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction projects: benchmarking the key result areas. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 407–21.

Yap, J B H and Chow, I N (2020) Investigating the managerial ‘‘nuts and bolts’’ for the construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(03), 331–48.